A federal court blocked a widely used abortion pill from distribution by mail. Here’s what to know

A panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the abortion pill mifepristone must be distributed in person, a decision expected to be appealed to the Supreme Court

Justin Tomlinson

Editor-in-Chief, Mora Discover

2 sources
A federal court blocked a widely used abortion pill from distribution by mail. Here’s what to know

A federal appeals court has issued a ruling that restricts access to mifepristone, one of the most widely used methods for abortion in the United States. A panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals determined that the medication can no longer be distributed by mail and must instead be provided to patients in person at clinics. This restriction applies across all 50 states, affecting even those regions where abortion remains legal and unrestricted.[1][2]

The decision comes at a time when mail-order prescriptions have become a critical avenue for abortion access following the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade. Since that landmark decision allowed for the enforcement of various state-level bans, the ability to receive medication by mail has served as a primary way for individuals to obtain abortions, including those residing in states with strict prohibitions.[1][2]

Friday's ruling is currently in effect as the litigation proceeds through the federal court system. Legal experts and observers expect the case to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court for a final determination. In the interim, the requirement for in-person distribution significantly limits the reach of medication abortion, which has grown in prevalence over the last several years.[1][2]

Related stories

Elon Musk and Sam Altman face off in OpenAI trial
Elon Musk and Sam Altman face off in OpenAI trial
The Guardian

Elon Musk and Sam Altman face off in OpenAI trial

Trial is culmination of a years-long feud between Musk and Altman that has become increasingly viciousThe trial pitting Elon Musk against Sam Altman and OpenAI began in dramatic fashion on Tuesday with opening arguments and the richest man in the world taking the stand to testify. Attorneys for the two tech moguls presented a California jury with two wildly different versions of the AI company’s history, while Musk accused his billionaire rival of endangering humanity through corporate deception.Musk’s suit argues that Altman, OpenAI and its president, Greg Brockman, broke a foundational...

The Iran war and the future of energy
The Iran war and the future of energy
hereandnow

The Iran war and the future of energy

The average price of gas in the U.S. hit a wartime high of $4.30 on Thursday, according to AAA. Bloomberg's Michael Regan breaks down the latest numbers. And, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent global energy prices skyrocketing and led to oil and gas shortages in parts of the world. Economic historian, author and S&P Global vice chairman Daniel Yergin says the Hormuz oil shock will lead to a new global balance of power. He joins us.See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR...

Elon Musk testifies in lawsuit against OpenAI
Elon Musk testifies in lawsuit against OpenAI
The Guardian

Elon Musk testifies in lawsuit against OpenAI

Lawyers for Musk, the world’s richest person, sought to paint him as a tech pioneer who wanted to aid humanityAfter a dramatic first day of opening statements and testimony from Elon Musk in his case against Sam Altman and OpenAI, the trial continues on Wednesday with a cross examination of the Tesla CEO. Musk began his second day of testimony by repeating the accusation that Altman “stole a charity” and would endanger humanity with AI multiple times. OpenAI’s defense attorneys will have the chance to press the world’s richest man on his allegations.Peripheral to the legal showdown...