Corte federal rechaza el intento de Trump de impedir que los migrantes soliciten asilo en la frontera

Un tribunal federal de apelaciones bloqueó el intento del presidente Donald Trump de impedir unilateralmente que los migrantes que cruzan la frontera con México soliciten asilo

Justin Tomlinson

Editor-in-Chief, Mora Discover

2 sources

Un tribunal federal de apelaciones emitió un fallo este viernes en el que rechaza el intento del presidente Donald Trump de impedir unilateralmente que los migrantes que cruzan la frontera entre Estados Unidos y México soliciten asilo. La decisión, que se tomó mediante una opinión dividida entre los jueces, invalida la política que buscaba restringir el acceso al proceso de asilo para las personas que ingresan al territorio estadounidense a través de la frontera sur.[1][2]

Esta resolución judicial representa un obstáculo legal para la administración de Trump, que ha buscado implementar diversas medidas para controlar el flujo migratorio. Al rechazar la capacidad del presidente para actuar de forma unilateral en este asunto, el tribunal se pronunció sobre la política que afecta a los migrantes que buscan asilo. El fallo se produce tras los esfuerzos del gobierno por modificar los procedimientos de asilo vigentes en la frontera con México.[1]

El escenario legal actual sugiere que la disputa sobre esta política de asilo podría escalar en el futuro. Con este rechazo por parte del tribunal de apelaciones, se prepara el camino para un enfrentamiento sobre la legalidad de las restricciones impuestas a los migrantes en la frontera. La decisión de este viernes mantiene la posibilidad de que los migrantes soliciten asilo tras cruzar la frontera entre Estados Unidos y México, tras el rechazo al intento de bloqueo unilateral.[1][2]

Related stories

Elon Musk testifies in lawsuit against OpenAI
Elon Musk testifies in lawsuit against OpenAI
The Guardian

Elon Musk testifies in lawsuit against OpenAI

Lawyers for Musk, the world’s richest person, sought to paint him as a tech pioneer who wanted to aid humanityAfter a dramatic first day of opening statements and testimony from Elon Musk in his case against Sam Altman and OpenAI, the trial continues on Wednesday with a cross examination of the Tesla CEO. Musk began his second day of testimony by repeating the accusation that Altman “stole a charity” and would endanger humanity with AI multiple times. OpenAI’s defense attorneys will have the chance to press the world’s richest man on his allegations.Peripheral to the legal showdown...

Elon Musk and Sam Altman face off in OpenAI trial
Elon Musk and Sam Altman face off in OpenAI trial
The Guardian

Elon Musk and Sam Altman face off in OpenAI trial

Trial is culmination of a years-long feud between Musk and Altman that has become increasingly viciousThe trial pitting Elon Musk against Sam Altman and OpenAI began in dramatic fashion on Tuesday with opening arguments and the richest man in the world taking the stand to testify. Attorneys for the two tech moguls presented a California jury with two wildly different versions of the AI company’s history, while Musk accused his billionaire rival of endangering humanity through corporate deception.Musk’s suit argues that Altman, OpenAI and its president, Greg Brockman, broke a foundational...

Trump Unhurt After Shooting at White House Correspondents' Dinner
Trump Unhurt After Shooting at White House Correspondents' Dinner
kbc

Trump Unhurt After Shooting at White House Correspondents' Dinner

The United States of America (USA) President Donald Trump was Saturday rushed to safety from the White House Correspondents’ Dinner after gunshots were heard at the venue. The suspect was arrested. An officer was shot at close range, but his bullet-proof vest saved him. According to US media reports, the incident occurred at the Washington […]The post Trump unhurt and suspect in custody after shots fired at White House correspondents’ dinner appeared first on KBC Digital.

Synthesized from 5 sources